Obama & Warren

Yet, again, Obama demonstrates why he should not be elected President. He also demonstrates why no Christian should be voting for him. From his own quotes he demonstrates his lack of Biblical Christian understanding, lack of Christian values and his lack of care for human life.

Warren is just as guilty, as he should never give any person who supports abortion a platform in the house of God. Instead of giving a platform, Rick Warren should have been correcting Obama, as he is a professing believer, over his statements about abortion and same-sex marriage. But nothing was said, as we do not want to offend these days.

I am only going to focus on one of Obama’s statements, as it should disqualify him as our President who when asked the tough questions says, “I think that whether you're looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity is above my pay grade.” What? He is the President and he is to lead the nation. Why does he think turning the question over to the people is not above their pay grade? It is a cop-out answer. Will he use this when dealing with foreign affairs, “I am not a historian or a national of their country, so I cannot comment on their suicide bombings, because that is above my pay grade.” Seems to me that answer will fit everything while he is doing nothing as a President. But I digress.

At his first statement, Obama makes it sound like he wants a Christian culture and values when he says, “We still don’t abide by that basic precept of Matthew — whatever you do to the least of my brothers, you do to me,” but then he goes on and contradicts himself no more then a few statements later.

Obama says on abortion, “On this particular issue, if you believe that life begins at conception ... and you are consistent, then I can’t argue with you on that,” he said. “What I can do is say are there ways we can work together to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies?” He supports Roe v. Wade, therefore does not believe in life at conception. Even says that he cannot argue with the consistent view of life at conception, but then goes on to say that he still wants Roe v. Wade, but will be willing to work on ways to slow the killing of babies down. Of course, he tries to flower it by saying that he wants to help slow down some unwanted pregnancies. How about adoption? How about telling them to stop having sex? I know, they are going to anyway. Well, then there is something called responsibility. Obama wants the continuation of legalized murder.

How does abortion even line up with the first quote above that he says we are not treating the least of my brothers and sisters? I think killing them is not the greatest way to treat them. If unborn babies are not the least of our family, in the sense of unable to help themselves, then I am not sure who is. They did not choose to be here, the two people having sex made that decision. Obama’s way of helping is to kill them. That sounds exactly like how Hitler was going to help his country by killing off the Jews. As is said in the movie Horton Hears a Who, “A person is a person no matter how small.” Murdering innocent people to further your agenda, whether a tyrant or running for office, is never acceptable in any circumstance.

To vote for Obama is to vote for murder of the innocent, no matter how great you think the rest of his plans are. Obama is not for change, as we already have acceptable murder. Change would be someone who will fight for our unborn children. There is plenty of room for the unborn on this planet, and yes there are plenty of parents that will adopt new born babies. There are waiting lists. Murder is neither change nor the answer!

Luke 17:2 says, “It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were thrown into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.”

What worse offense is there then killing them?