I have not read the book, and probably will not as most of his books ended up causing me much frustration and concern. This is a good review in my opinion from a trusted writer. I have read enough of his book from the free pages you can attain and the many quotes from those that are both in support and against the book to get a good idea. Not much different from his other books. At least he is consistent in his universalistic thoughts, even if he will not say he is. I just don't know why he won't admit it, as I would respect him more as a writer and speaker if he did. I don't like it from any writer when they won't admit where they stand and hide in vagueness and tautology.
No comments:
Post a Comment